← vanagon.com home · Continue the discussion in the forum
VanagonEuroVan
Sort by authorSort by posting dateSort by topicChronological orderMost recent firstShow authorHide authorShow table of contentsHide table of contentsBack to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGONSearch
Subject:Re: Tires.. Again..Insurance reasons...
From:SDF ( aka ;jim lahey' - Scott ) <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM>
Date:Sun, 21 Jun 2015 22:16:50 -1000

it's true ...
mild understeer as a basic handling trait is 'safer' for most
people...or less-skilled drivers..

And a vehicle that has just a touch of understeer at the limit is just fine.

Oversteer of course is generally dangerous and requiring much more
driver skills.

examples of Famous and notorious understeering cars .

Probably the early Porsche 911's were the worst fairly common car by far.
That model car started in 1965- at a time when VW Bugs still had swing
axle rear suspension ..

At one point Porsche even had weights in the front bumper to tone down
twitchness ( and oversteer ) when changing direction .  Not sure if they
increased the wheel base   a tiny bit in the late 60's but they may have.

 > they're still making that model ...longest run of one continuously
developed platform ....super dialed in now with no vices like oversteer
or steering kicking back on pumps.   You've come a long way Baby. >

and VW owns Porsche now  too , for VW content.

but 'terminal understeer' .....like 'very prone to understeer badly and
early in steady-state cornering' ..
that sucks.

On 6/21/2015 3:38 AM, Don Hanson wrote:
> Some have deduced that manufacturers recommended tire pressures are meant
> to actually cause vehicles to understeer, withpotential lawsuits as the
> main reason rather than effective traction..   (understeer is when the
> front tires lose  traction first. so the vehicle 'plows' straight ahead
> when the traction limit is exceeded)   This is said to be a decision made
> by lawyers and insurance companies so that they can avoid liability when
> people 'over-drive' their vehicles and crash em....When the crash happens,
> it's can more easily be proven to be the driver's fault if the car goes
> front-first into the ditch...."That car was going too fast!...See, he just
> couldn't make the corner, he went straight off......"   like that.   If the
> the vehicle was sold with some understeer (when the rear end loses traction
> first) the Lawyers can argue that it was the vehicle's manufacturers fault
> ......"The driver was just going round the corner and all of a sudden, the
> car spun out and flew off the road....."
>

Back to June 2015, week 4
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »